Film Review

Moffie : Review

A moffie, a person who is weak, effeminate, gay. A way of life deemed evil, illegal, persons shunned as outcasts, usually facing aggression and anger.

Set in 1981 South Africa, we join sixteen year old Nicholas van der Swart (Kai Luke Brümmer) in the eve of his national service conscription. A time that every white male youth in the Republic had to endure, doing their duty against the terrorist and communist threat.

Based on the book by André-Carl van der Merwe, Moffie tells a tale known to many, but this telling does not come down on either side, neither pushing for or against the cause of the designated moffies. The film treats the issue of national service much the same, being neither for nor against, just telling the fact that many young men went off to ‘The Border’ and came back changed, or not at all.

The story feels more like we’re following a series of events, ticking a series of checkboxes, rather than being taken on an emotional journey. While one can not fault those said checkboxes, as they cover aspects of almost every story told by those who where there, on the border, fighting for their country, the story of Nicholas is lacking that certain something, to draw one in, make one care for the character, understand the time.

From a war perspective, we are treated to very little action. A mere suggestion of the violence experienced on patrol is given, but feels merely as a stop along the way to ticking yet one more checkbox. Not forgetting the homosexual aspect of the film, this makes more appearances than the violence of war. But troops were all treated like nothings when they first start their basic training, and most time the film depicts this equal opportunity bad treatment, rather than the much worse treatment someone of the day would have thrust upon them.

Moffie tells the story of a group ostracised back in a time when many expected conformity, but while telling the story, it is merely taking one from event to event, reminding those who were actually there, of lines from stories or anecdotes they might tell. Had it delved deeper, got the audience invested in taking a side, it would have made for a much more powerful tale. Sadly, it comes down squarely in the middle of each topic, and its own potential to be great rather than average.

Moffie opens 13 March 2020 in South African cinemas.

Interview With Oliver Hermanus

What inspired you to adapt André-Carl van der Merwe’s iconic memoir?

When I first read the book I was quite taken by the texture and detail it told of this part of our history. I did not know about the treatment of gay conscripts, about psychiatric Ward 22 or the damage that
the system did to so many men and I felt very strongly that there was a power to Moffie that needed to be told on a cinema screen.

What was it about the story that resonated with you?

At the centre of this film there is a word: Moffie. Any gay man living in South Africa knows this word and has a relationship with it. It’s a weapon that has been used against us for so long. I felt a strong
pull to explore my own history with this word – which ended up being a scene in the film. I think it was the want to denuclearise, to reform this word that was at the heart of my decision to make this film.

Issues of identity are and sexuality are more pertinent today than they were in 1981, when the story takes place, do you agree?

Absolutely. We are living in a global culture where we still see the persecution of the LGBT community all over the world. At the same time, never before has the voice of this global community been more
heard. A film like Moffie is there to remind us of what has come before, what we have endured and suffered through and why it is important to never stop being vocal and proud.

For some, Moffie has a derogatory meaning, to others it’s a term of endearment. How do you see it?

I see it as a weapon. I avoid using the word. It still has stigma for me and making this film allowed me to talk to other gay men about their relationship with this word. For most, I think, it still carries pain. I
am all for the act of appropriating it for good but like the book, I hope that having it as the title of the film will go some way to eroding the word’s toxicity.

With Skoonheid you delved in the psyche of a young man who becomes the object of desire of an older man, with Moffie you explore the sexuality of a gay man imprisoned by society and the laws of the apartheid government. What are your views on this?

Skoonheid was about repression and self-loathing where I would say that Moffie is about what comes before shame and indoctrination. The two films will of course go hand in hand, one might even say
that Moffie plays as a prequel but I think their messages are very different and as much as Moffie is about a gay man’s journey through the SADF (South African Defense Force), it is also the journey of an entire generation of white men, gay and straight. The film rests its attention on them all.

Was it a difficult process from idea to screen? What were the challenges?

This has been a four-year journey! I would say that the major obstacle was the casting process. Because the film’s characters are all 18 or so, it’s a tough age group to cast. We spent more than a
year finding our core cast and were quite blown away by the unseen talent in South Africa.’

Tell me about the cast and how you approached them to bring the characters to life?

The cast are made up of high school students, trained actors, untrained actors and even non-actors. They spent a good amount of time with a military advisor who put them through an SADF boot camp. They learnt how to shoot R1 rifles and of course they we were taught how to drill. I then spent a few weeks rehearsing with them in Cape Town and beyond that tried to fill their heads with as much
history about the time as I could.

What do you hope audiences will get from watching Moffie?

I hope audiences will get an visceral experience. The film is heartfelt and emotive. No doubt, for some, it will conjure up memories of their own time in the military but most of all I think the film is a bit
of tearjerker, so perhaps some tears?”

Tell me about some of the issues regarding being a Moffie that you deal with in the film?

The film’s primary focus is masculinity. It explores the way that white South African men have been made for over a century. How the apartheid system, the army and the conservative nature of this
country fed young boys an ideology of superiority and hate.

Being a moffie in this context meant being a crime, being a problem, a mistake. How did you approach these issues as a filmmaker?

With a lot of research, ha-ha! For me, personally, it was sticking to the core idea that this was a system of hate and separation, and the intention of the conscription was to reinforce and protect that
system. I want to show that process through the film, letting an audience witness and experience the indoctrination.

Why do you think it was so difficult for young conscripted men to deal with their gayness during this period in South African history?

Because of the simple fact that it was deemed criminal and it was dangerous. The society at that time was determined to keep gay men and women in the closet.

Do you think it has changed much, even with the new rainbow nation constitutional support?

In the army, I am not too sure. But in the general public, the has been a change. I guess the simple fact that I can make a film like this is testament to that.

Being gay has always been an issue when it comes to the military internationally. Why do you think this milieu makes it so confrontational?

I think it is the nature of the army – it is an inherently masculine, heterosexual space and is, to a large degree, inhabited by men. I think that with the context comes an expectation and an assumption
that all men in the military should want to be heteronormative. Of course, we have now seen how that is changing.

Oliver Hermanus was born in Cape Town, South Africa, on 26 May, 1983, completed his Master of Arts degree at the London Film School and has won numerous awards for his work all over the world.

Film Review

Sonic The Hedgehog – Review

A Japanese video game launched back in 1991 for the Sega Genesis, Sonic The Hedgehog, has finally had a game to film conversion. Something not many games actually get right. Sonic would become the mascot of Sega. Some years later a two part video animation was released as a means to promote the release of Sonic on the new Sega Dreamcast, although it was felt this was more for fans of the digital hedgehog, rather than a wider audience.

In this latest outing, Tom Wachowski (James Marsden – X-Men: Days of Future Past, Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues), a cop from a small, peaceful town discovers a small, extremely fast, hedgehog (Ben Schwartz – The Walk). Having a big heart, and some persuasion, he agrees to help this little fella, and save him from evil genius Dr. Ivo Robotnik (Jim Carrey – Kick-Ass 2).

Sonic The Hedgehog succeeds where so many films of games have failed. It is a fun, exciting, and entertaining romp. It is a nostalgic escape from the world, that while it has a great story at its core, still does not try to hard to take itself too seriously, and this is where Carrey pull of a masterful incarnation of the evil doctor. He is perfectly cast and suited for the role. One doesn’t know whether to cheer him on, or cheer his demise.

Sonic The Hedgehog will appeal to both fans of the original game, and a new audience of the younger generation. A family outing that is sure to spawn a sequel, if not yet another release of the game.

Sonic the Hedgehog opens 21 February 2020 in South African cinemas.

Film Review

Gemini Man : Review

Ageing hitman Henry Brogan (Will Smith – Aladdin, Suicide Squad) has his sights set on retiring, but as these type of stories go, he agrees to “just one more”. While on this mission, he encounters Danny (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), and the two are soon embroiled in a game of cat and mouse with governments, and Junior (also played by Will Smith).

While Gemini Man is directed by Ang Lee, the film pales in comparison to any of his other works, lacking any cinematic shots, editing that feels like a student music video, and just not living up to what anyone would expect.

Gemini Man has very little going for it. One feels inclined to root for the bad guy. The action sequences feel dull, and not because the screen brightness at Ster Kinekor, Cavendish in Cape Town is woefully too dark, but but there is just no exciting action to speak of. An action file that is sorely lacking, where it counts.

Character development, there is none. Each person on screen feels like a template, downplayed to the level of a light hum, instead of an all out action star.

Gemini Man is a film with a bunch of missed opportunity, rather than a satisfying story. One comes away feeling robbed of a few hours of fun. And it almost feels like no one really tried.

The film opens 11 October 2019, in South African cinemas.

Film Review

Joker : Review

In this, the fifth big screen outing of the infamous foe of Batman, we are lured into the world of Arthur Fleck (Joaquin Phoenix) as he spirals toward a character transition, from simple man to crazed merchant of evil.

This is a gritty film, far removed from the likes of previous films starring Cesar Romero, Jack Nicholson, Mark Hamill, Heath Ledger, and Jared Leto. While the film is a lot darker than any previous story featuring Joker, there are to a more or lesser degree, aspects of those appearances present. Most notably, the strongest being that of Heath Ledger’s Clown Prince.

Joker follows the inherent personality transition of Arthur Fleck to The Joker, played out through a social commentary on society, and its blatant disregard for those who are different or of a lower status. With many ideas and story aspects being familiar, there are, at the same time, many differences. Starting with Joker’s origin, and including a look at the politics that would come to shape the city, known for its birth of The Dark Knight.

There are many subtle, and not so subtle, influences from both popular and classic culture present in the film. Charlie Chaplin’s film Modern Times provides both visuals in many scenes and story context to the character of Joker, something that is sure to thrill any film student or lover of the black and white silent films of yesteryear. The references to The King of Comedy as part of a sub-plot to the film, serve both as a homage and exposition to the state of Arthur’s mind, acting as a thermometer for the viewer, allowing one to judge just how far along the road he is from Arthur to Joker, playing out on a live comedy show, presented by Murray Franklin, placing the cherry on the top by being played by Robert De Niero who played Rupert Pupkin in the 1982 film.

Joker is a masterpiece of story layers, character driven by a talented cast. As we delve deeper into the underbelly of Gotham City, lamenting both status and status-quo, allowing the viewer to slip into a mindset of indifference. The film is an engrossing journey, with few pauses allowing for thought or analysis. This is a film that sets out to share a story, and it impresses, greatly. While the violence and subject matter may not be for everyone, it is more certainly a film one must see, and no doubt will be one of the top films in quite some time. Great film, cinematography, acting, character and story – one would seldom want more from a cinematic narrative.

Joker opens in South African cinemas on 4 October 2019

Film Review

The Lion King (2019) : Review

The story we all know, retold with stunning photorealism. With the tragic murder of his father, Mufasa (James Earl Jones – Rogue One), a young lion prince, Simba (young Simba JD McCrary and older Simba Donald Glover – Solo: A Star Wars Story, Spider-Man: Homecoming), flees the kingdom on the advice of his uncle, Scar (Chiwetel Ijiofor – Doctor Strange, Triple 9). Now he must learn the true meaning of responsibility, bravery, his place in the world, and the circle of life.

For those who grew up with the animated version of The Lion King (1994), enough time has passed that one avoids the risk of having a fun childhood memory spoiled. The songs we all know and love are all there, all the characters present, yet we are treated to a new line-up of voices. New voices, that is, apart from the legendary James Earl Jones, playing Mufasa in both films.

While the graphics and detail in this latest incarnation are great, they do pose the problem of disconnecting the viewer from the story. The animals feel more akin to the watching of a nature documentary, with actors reading lines, rather than being connected to the voices and emotion they should contain.

The story remains sound, the music evokes excitement, and there are a good many laughs. But apart from the graphics upgrade, this version of the film comes second to the first outing of the lovable lions. A good try, but falling a little short of the mark.

The Lion King opens 19 July 2019 in South African cinemas.