{"id":7757,"date":"2018-10-14T16:22:28","date_gmt":"2018-10-14T14:22:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/?p=7757"},"modified":"2018-10-14T16:22:28","modified_gmt":"2018-10-14T14:22:28","slug":"qa-with-rory-kennedy-above-and-beyond-nasas-journey-to-tomorrow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/blog\/2018\/10\/14\/qa-with-rory-kennedy-above-and-beyond-nasas-journey-to-tomorrow\/","title":{"rendered":"Q&A With Rory Kennedy: Above And Beyond NASA’s Journey To Tomorrow"},"content":{"rendered":"

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong>\u00a0 Okay. DStv Magazine, can you ask your first question please?<\/p>\n

Speaker:<\/strong>\u00a0 Yes. The first question is, so how did people imagine cosmos before the era of NASA? It was 60 years of people in space, we can say, almost. And before this era, we didn\u2019t know how to eat this cosmos, how to perceive it. And how do you know, how do you do this, how do you imagine it?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Thank you. Well, first of all, this is Rory Kennedy, and I want to thank all of you for joining today. Again, we\u2019re sorry, but things were running behind here, and appreciate your patience, and I\u2019m excited to speak with you. And I appreciate you all of you giving some attention to the film and letting people know that it\u2019s coming out. So, thank you.<\/p>\n

In terms of the specific question, it\u2019s pretty mind-boggling and exciting to think about all that we\u2019ve learned in these last 60 years. And so, I think it\u2019s a good question to remember where we were 60 years ago, before NASA was really part of our efforts to understand and explore space. You know, prior to NASA we didn\u2019t have rocket ships that could go into \u2013 outside of our atmosphere; we had never sent a man up into space \u2013 that started with the Apollo programme. I think that, you know, everything that we knew really about the [inaudible] from the back end of a telescope here on planet Earth. And the knowledge of our solar system was quite limited, the galaxy as well, as, of course, our universe. And there has been an endless number of breakthroughs over these last six decades which are quite exciting and really led by NASA.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong>\u00a0 Perfect. Can we have the next question from Sarah, from DStv Magazine please.<\/p>\n

Sarah Borchert:<\/strong> Thank you very much. Hi Rory, it\u2019s lovely to talk to you. Why did you feel that this was an important story to tell now? What is significant about the 60 years, and are there other reasons perhaps for bringing NASA\u2019s story to the forefront again?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, I think that NASA has really done more for our understanding to some of the basic questions that we ponder as human beings \u2013 where did we come from, are we alone, what\u2019s to become of us. And the amount of knowledge that we\u2019ve learned from this institution I think is greater than any institution in history. So, now coming up on its 60th anniversary seems like a good time to look back and reflect on the accomplishments and that knowledge.<\/p>\n

I think I was particularly interested in this subject matter, in addition to it being the anniversary, in part, because of my uncle John F Kennedy\u2019s involvement and leadership in getting us to the moon; and his extraordinary speech at Rice University in 1962, which I think is one of his all-time great speeches; and the leadership that required, particularly at that time, where we hadn\u2019t sent a man up into space; where we didn\u2019t have the rocket ship capability; and where the stakes were so high; and the vision was so outlandish to think that we could get to the moon within the decade, but, in fact, we were able to accomplish that goal. And, of course, he had the innovation and the leadership and the vision, but NASA had to do the work \u2013 they had to build the rocket ships that would not only get us to the moon but then bring them back, most importantly.<\/p>\n

You know, it\u2019s an extraordinary thing all around and an exciting thing for me to look back on. But, I think also, you know, I grew up in that era, and the excitement of getting to the moon. And it\u2019s \u2013 I think that younger generations don\u2019t \u2013 didn\u2019t experience that, and so it\u2019s fun for me, and seems timely to share some of NASA\u2019s accomplishments, and hopefully ignite younger generations to get involved in exploration, space exploration, the innovation, and all the things that NASA is working on I think.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Oh, thank you, Sarah. Marwa from Gulf News?<\/p>\n

Marwa Hamad:<\/strong> Yes. Hi Rory, thanks for taking the time to chat to us today. I have a few questions, but I\u2019ll just go with the one for now which is, you know, you had to go for, I\u2019m assuming, through decades of footage for this, which seems like such an overwhelming, you know, process. How did you cull the material, and how did you decide what to leave on the cutting room floor, and how long did that process take?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Thank you. That was a significant part of the process for me in the archives, because I really wanted to make a film that would translate the extraordinary accomplishments of NASA. And part of that is doing \u2013 having a visual presentation that really ignites that kind of awe-inspiring feeling. And there are so many amazing images that have come out of NASA over these last many years that I really prioritise the archival process in this film-making endeavour. So, I had a very accomplished archive team, I had an archive producer. I hired them early on and worked very closely with them to identify the types of images that we were looking for. And it honestly almost felt like a curating position for me in the making of this film where we were pulling together some of the greatest images, but that also kind of spoke to meaningful moments in NASA\u2019s history.<\/p>\n

One of the challenges is that in the United States, NASA has ten different locations. You know, so it has the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the Johnson Space Center in Texas, the Jet Propulsion Lab in LA, or outside Pasadena technically, and the Goddard Space Center outside of Washington DC in Maryland. So, it has these centres scattered across the country and each of them has their own archive houses. So, there\u2019s not kind of one central location where everything is organised. So, it was, you know, it was a challenge. But, it was also a bit of a, kind of, fun scavenger hunt too, to research through all these incredible images and pull them together. And I hope for, you know, those of you \u2013 I don\u2019t know who\u2019s seen the film \u2013 but when you get to see it, that you experience it for all the awe and wonder that it deserves.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Lovely. Can we go to Fatima from El Mundo?<\/p>\n

Fatima Elidrissi:<\/strong> Hello Rory. I wanted to ask you why did you decide to approach this story of NASA from a personal point of view? And how important was John F Kennedy, as you mentioned before, both to the agency and to you personally?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, thank you for that question. I didn\u2019t intend to \u2013 when I signed on to the project \u2013 to have it be such a personal essay. But as I jumped into the material, I felt that the best way to tell this story, and because John F Kennedy\u2019s speech was so meaningful in the effort to get to the moon was such an extraordinary moment. And as a filmmaker, I like to have a relationship with the audience that\u2019s very transparent. And I felt it was important to position myself as John\u00a0F\u00a0Kennedy\u2019s niece so that it didn\u2019t come across as simply an objective point of view. And I also felt that it was a more interesting way to tackle the material, because I \u2013 when we started the process, it was kind of chronological in its telling, and it felt a little bit like a march through time, and didn\u2019t quite have the energy and vitality that I wanted it to. And I felt also because of the way that I wanted to frame it, which was this idea of the pull towards Earth and the push towards the outer echelons of the universe, that it felt structurally to do it more as an essay film and POV\u00a0film made it work better actually just as a film. And so, I kind of landed on that at some point during the process, and it felt like it was the right direction and the right move.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Perfect. Can we go \u2013 move on to Turkey now.<\/p>\n

Demet Sarova:<\/strong> Yes. Hi Rory, it\u2019s great to have this interview with you. And my question is you have produced documents about some of the world\u2019s most important problems like poverty, human rights issues, and all of them have achieved success. Is there a secret to their success?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Secret potion. I don\u2019t know that there\u2019s a secret to that success. You know, I feel very lucky to be making documentaries. I love filmmaking and I love sharing real stories with people, and I love the storytelling aspect of it, and I love the influence that it can have in opening minds and hearts alike. I think that every film I\u2019ve ever made has a new set of challenges and difficulties. In every single film I make, I think at some point in the process oh my God, this is a disaster, what was I thinking, I shouldn\u2019t have done this; but somehow, they kind of come around and the story emerges. And I\u2019ve been very happy with the work to date, and the films I\u2019ve been able to \u2013 and the stories I\u2019ve been able to tell and share.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Okay, we\u2019ll move on to Vanda from Savadel Magazine[?].<\/p>\n

Vanda Marques:<\/strong> Hello. Thank you so much for having us and for talking with us. What I would like to ask you, Rory, was throughout this research that you had to do for the documentary, all this footage, what was the most impressive thing that you discovered while doing this investigation and why was it so impressive?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, you know, I would say that I learned a huge amount during this process and really have a much deeper understanding and appreciation for NASA and all that we\u2019ve learned, much of which is often, frankly, invisible to the eye. You know, I think that there is \u2013 the stores of a lot of knowledge and information and technology that we use \u2013 I\u2019m looking at a cellphone right here \u2013 and the reason we have the little iPhone cameras in there is because of NASA and their need to make smaller cameras to go up on spacecraft and continue to document what happens up there.<\/p>\n

So, you know, there\u2019s all sorts of ways that NASA is a part of our world \u2013 the reason \u2013 the storage for weather is from NASA, and they feed it to NOAA which then feeds it to the weather channel or wherever you get your information about the weather. All of the satellites are having \u2013 you know, are then used by people all around the world and the information that comes out of them. But they are kind of the source material.<\/p>\n

So, I\u2019ve been understanding and appreciating just all the ways that NASA has influenced us and how it\u2019s helped us understand, you know, the basic questions. And, you know, with innovations like the Hubble telescope out in space and seeing the cosmos from that angle, and seeing stars being formed and supernovas and, you know, suns like our own forming; it\u2019s really an extraordinary thing \u2013 understanding that the galaxy \u2013 I mean, that the universe is expanding. We used to think we knew how big the universe was, and through NASA we now don\u2019t know, but we know that we don\u2019t know. It\u2019s really an amazing thing. And, you know, \u2013 and the number of exoplanets that it\u2019s uncovered, and 23 earth-like exoplanets that are in the Goldilocks zone that seemingly could harbour life.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s also an amazing thing how close they are to finding life, not only in the galaxy but in our solar system, which I think we\u2019re really right on the brink of. That they are, you know, really are at the brink of also having the technology to get us to Mars and get us back from Mars. It\u2019s amazing that we\u2019ve sent the Curiosity rover up to Mars and because of that, and because of the scientific lab, that we understand that Mars was much like Earth 3.5 billion years ago when Earth started harbouring life, and that it had water on it \u2013 you know, that is because of NASA.<\/p>\n

But I think to me the most pressing and urgent breakthrough has really been around their knowledge of climate change, and what we\u2019re doing through the use of carbon. And, you know, as humans and the damage we\u2019re doing to this planet and the long-term consequence of that, which \u2013 and the immediate consequence. I mean, we are experiencing what they predicted, which is more severe storms, higher sea levels, fires, more drought. You know, the [inaudible] that these scientists have for where that\u2019s going to take us not in 100 years but now and the next year, and the year after that. And the consequence of that which is significant and, you know, the stakes are very, very high. I mean, it is human\u2019s ability to survive climate change, if we don\u2019t change course, it\u2019s deeply concerning [inaudible] NASA report to me.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Thank you. Can I get the next question from Ludmilla from Russia?<\/p>\n

Ludmilla Arinchina:<\/strong> Yes. Hi Rory, my question is did you face any challenges during your work on above and beyond NASA\u2019s journey [inaudible]<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Okay, I\u2019m going to \u2013 I think what you were asking me is did you face any challenges during the work of making this film.<\/p>\n

Ludmilla Arinchina:<\/strong> Yes. And if yes, what were they?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy: Yeah. Well, yeah, there were a lot of challenges in the making of this film. You know, I mean, one of the things about NASA is it has so many initiatives over a long period of time, and we were really trying to celebrate all of those. But some of them, other than being part of the same institution, felt disparate and not necessarily connected. For example, you know, initiatives around the International Space Station or the Hubble and [Inaudible] telescope versus what \u2013 the work that they were doing and continue to do on Earth and the Arctic and Antarctica and the Greenland ice sheet, as well as in the oceans and Hawaii and throughout the world; and then jumping back to the Curiosity rover and exploration of Mars, and how we get to Mars and the James Webb telescope. And then, you know, the network of antennas that enable us to communicate with the satellites and the orbiters, landers and rovers that are exploring different planets in our solar systems and beyond.<\/p>\n

So, it was a challenge to kind of synthesise all of that. And, you know, it\u2019s also complex ideas of how things work, and what the significance of each of them are and how it relates to larger ideas of where we came from and life in the universe and whatnot. I mean it was challenging. And then I would say the archives, as one of you mentioned earlier, you know, there was just thousands, tens of thousands of images and media that NASA has generated. So, figuring out a system to go through that and really get the best of it all was certainly challenging. But hopefully we figured it out and there\u2019s a good film there.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Perfect. Okay, can we go back to Marta from Newsweek? Can we get your next question?<\/p>\n

Marta Tomaszkiewicz:<\/strong> Yes, thank you. After the Challenger and Columbia catastrophes, NASA seemed to take a back seat in terms of the expanse[?] space travelling and development of reusable space technology. Some people think NASA has been over-performed by private companies, for example, SpaceX or Boeing. How do you think about this opinion, do you agree with it?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, I think that NASA, if you look back through its history, has always worked with the private sector. I think that, you know, even in getting to the moon, rocket ships were made with the support of private sector companies. So, there\u2019s more attention towards that today but I don\u2019t feel that it is a dramatic departure from how NASA has always worked. And I think it as a model is a good way of moving forward, because I think there are a lot of things that NASA can do. There are some limitations as a government agency, and there\u2019s a lot that the private sector can do but they have their own limitations. And the ability to partner I think can really bring out the best in both of them.<\/p>\n

I think that, you know, for the last many years with the end of the Space Shuttle, we have been relying on the Russian Soyuz to get people back and forth to the Space Station, and we have not sent up our own people on our own spaceships. And I would like to see us do that again. But, whether that\u2019s through NASA directly or through SpaceX and Boeing, which is the current initiative, I think that is only very positive.<\/p>\n

I think the other thing, you know, that has been really exceptional about NASA is their willingness and interest in working and collaborating with not only, you know, the best and brightest minds in this country but internationally as well, and within the private sector as well. And I think really what you want when you are pushing limits and innovating is to pull together the best and brightest. And I think one way to do that is this kind of partnership. And I think it\u2019s a great model not just for NASA but for other companies and our government as well.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:\u00a0<\/strong> Perfect. Thanks, Marta. Can we go back to Sarah from DStv Magazine.<\/p>\n

Sarah Borchert:<\/strong> Yes, sure. Rory, are you ever confronted with the conspiracy theory about the moon landing having being filmed in a Hollywood basement, and if so, do you ever bother to engage with them and what do you say?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> I have been confronted with them every now and then, and I say that it\u2019s not true.<\/p>\n

Sarah Borchert:<\/strong> Yeah, that\u2019s what I say.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Marwa from Gulf News?<\/p>\n

Marwa Hamad:<\/strong> Yeah. I guess, I think a lot of times our entry point into NASA are introductions that happen pretty early in life, it starts like a childlike curiosity or awe. Do you remember some of your earliest memories and, you know, where your interest stems from before adulthood?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> You know, I mean, I was born in 1968, and so, I was, you know, obviously very young. I mean I don\u2019t have a memory of landing on the moon, and the Apollo missions were on their way out by the time I gained consciousness. But I grew up in the aftermath of that, and I was, you know, I had the great honour and privilege of being surrounded by people like John Glenn who was good friends with my family and was obviously the first American to orbit Earth. And so, these people were really heroes in my childhood. And so, \u2013 and I had such an appreciation of my uncle Jack and his vision and leadership in getting us to the moon and what that took, that I felt that NASA was very much kind of in the ether of my childhood and was an institution that I always had great admiration and respect for.<\/p>\n

You know, I think over time, I mean, there are some memories and understandings of, you know, curiosity, getting to the \u2013 to Mars, you know, that I was aware of and excited about, and finding water on Mars and kind of these moments. And certainly, the Shuttle programme and the Shuttle disasters were moments that I have recollection of, and the Hubble spacecraft launching and then not having the right mirrors, and then then innovations to fix those and get it working, and the images that came out of that were really awe-inspiring for me.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Next question from Fatima from El Mundo please.<\/p>\n

Fatima Elidrissi:<\/strong> Well, yes, I also wanted to ask you about what the different relationships recent Presidents of the USA had with NASA. For example, George Bush wanted to return to the moon, then Barack Obama cancelled that programme to try to go to Mars. And now, Donald Trump has said that the goal is again returning to the moon. So, I wanted to ask you about what do you think about this and is it really possible to achieve something if every administration changes the previous plan.<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> I think it\u2019s a good question, and you\u2019re tapping into, you know, the way that NASA is structured which is that it is, you know, controlled and governed by the executive branch and the President of the United States. So, you know, that position changes every four years. In terms of leadership, I\u2019m hopeful that [inaudible] will be two years but that\u2019s to be seen. In any case, I think that it is difficult and it is a challenge in the way that NASA is structured, because some of these initiatives like getting to Mars, you really need to think through 10, 15, 20 years out in order for it to happen. And it\u2019s hard for Presidents to think that far ahead and to be invested in something that happens outside of their tenure. That said, despite the limitation of the leadership turnaround, NASA has managed to accomplish extraordinary things over the past 60 years, and so something\u2019s working.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Thank you. Next question from Turkey please.<\/p>\n

Demet Sarova:<\/strong> My next question is you have been at the backstage of NASA, how did this environment make you feel?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, I love talking to astronauts who have been to outer space because I think they\u2019re really cool. And to, you know, hear about blasting off and then leaving our atmosphere, and having that perspective on Earth, and seeing this little ball in the vastness of space and the impact that that has on them is a really an extraordinary experience and a beautiful thing. And kind of the poetry and the \u2013 really awe of their ability to articulate their \u2013 the emotional experience; and the, you know, the deep love and connection to this planet was part of the, you know, part of the process I loved the most. I think it\u2019s all so really \u2013 you know, I went to a lot of these space stations and centres of NASA, and to be at headquarters, to be at these locations where, you know, they have been interacting with space shuttles over the years, or with, you know, Apollo 13 or, you know, the moon after a launch, you know, it\u2019s really cool and awe-inspiring as well. And then, you know, I go to places like the Johnson Space Center where they have a pool that can fit what is the equivalent of the International Space Station inside of it, and that they go diving, and to see these astronauts in these diving suits and how they stand in the water for six, seven, eight hours a day, and how they go about doing spacewalks and get trained for that, and the intensity of that training is so impressive, you know. So, it was fun to \u2013 for me to get that perspective and that behind the scenes.<\/p>\n

You know, I remember doing an interview with Peggy Whitson while she was on the International Space Station going 17,000 miles around Earth, orbiting Earth. You know, so those are moments that I\u2019ll never forget.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Thank you. The next question from Samvada Magazine[?].<\/p>\n

Vanda Marques:<\/strong> Yes. I would like to ask did you have the opportunity to try any of those preparations like antigravity or something like that? And would you like to go on a journey out to space, would you be able to dream of you going to Mars if you were able to do something like this?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> I did some cool things. I mean I got into some spaceships that weren\u2019t operating, and then I \u2013 but they were, you know, real spaceships. And I was able to, you know, go very close to the James Webb and the building of that which was \u2013 is really cool and impressive. I was \u2013 I was able to do some \u2013 you know, go to the pool and be witness to that experience and was really amazing. And then, you know, they have a kind of 3D programme that \u2013 a VR programme that they do which also helps them in the training and the communicating with astronauts in other countries. And so, I was able to do that. So, yeah, there were some of these things that I was able to be a part of. But in terms of going to space, I don\u2019t think anybody wants me on a spaceship going to Mars. I\u2019m a little \u2013 I don\u2019t really like heights, I\u2019m a little claustrophobic. I think I\u2019m better off just making documentaries of everybody else \u2013<\/p>\n

Vanda Marques:<\/strong> Okay.<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> I would like to have gone to space, but I don\u2019t want to actually go to space.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Shall we have the next question from Ludmilla from Russia, please?<\/p>\n

Ludmilla Arinchina:<\/strong> Thank you. [Inaudible] and did you meet any interesting people during the production and what did they say to you, and what surprised you?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Yeah. So, I met a lot of interesting people. I mean, I would say, you know, I really have a love and administration for astronauts. So, I was able to interview people like Jim Lovell, who was the Commander of Apollo 13, and he was also on the first mission, Apollo mission that circumnavigated the moon, Apollo 8. And so, to hear first-hand from him about what those missions were like and those experiences was really amazing. You know, I interviewed a number of women astronauts, like Sunita Williams and Peggy Whitson, while she was on the ISS, which was really cool; Mark and Scott Kelly who were the identical twins. And spent \u2013 you know, the impact it has on the human body, and the studies that were done connected to that was really interesting to me.<\/p>\n

And then, you know, there\u2019s other people who are less known but are hugely important in terms of their innovations and ability to push the realm of what was considered possible and whether that\u2019s, you know, people \u2013 the folks who helped get Curiosity to Mars and what it took to do that was amazing. A number of the administrators, people like Pete Gordon[?], who\u2019s really working in the field of looking at the search for life in the universe, and how they\u2019re going about that is fascinating to me. So, yeah, and endless number of fascinating people.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:\u00a0<\/strong>So, now we\u2019re going to go to Marta from Newsweek for your last question.<\/p>\n

Marta Tomaszkiewicz:<\/strong> Thank you. So, my last question, could you name five \u2013 maybe less, maybe more \u2013 five greatest NASA\u2019s achievements, what do you think in your opinion?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Five of the greatest NASA achievements? Okay, well, I would say getting us to the moon. Understanding our, you know, Voyager 1 and 2, which were launched starting in 1977, and really helped us understand our solar system I think was an extraordinary accomplishment. Certainly, the Hubble spacecraft \u2013 not spacecraft, telescope, and getting that into space is an extraordinary achievement. I think one of the images that I appreciate most coming from Hubble was the Deep Field, which looked \u2013 Hubble looked at a very dark part of the sky that was the size of a thumbnail, that they didn\u2019t think anything was there. And they identified because of that image 10,000 new galaxies \u2013 and that was in the space, you know, in a part of the sky that was as big as a thumbnail. So, you know, they now have an understanding that there are so many more galaxies, 100 billion galaxies, and each galaxy has billions of stars. And the furthest galaxy that Hubble has detected is 13 billion light years away. You know, those are kind of crazy mind\u2011blowing notions and ideas that we now have an understanding of because of Hubble.<\/p>\n

I\u00a0think also, the Kepler spacecraft \u2013 telescope, and the identifying of the exoplanet which also, you know, they really didn\u2019t have an understanding of the number of exoplanets that are in the universe, and now have a much deeper understanding of that.<\/p>\n

And then I think everything we\u2019ve learned about this planet and this \u2013 Earth, because of, you know, some combination of the \u2013 they\u2019ve launched over two dozen satellites, there\u2019s 19 operating right now that are helping to monitor the weather systems, they\u2019re monitoring the fires, they\u2019re monitoring the ice and the ice melt in the Arctic and Antarctica and Greenland ice sheet. You know, we know because of the studies, you know, of \u2013 that are coming out of NASA. We know that the temperatures increased one Celsius degree, and that we\u2019ve had, you know, 14 of the 15 hottest years on record because \u2013 since 2000 \u2013 because of the research that NASA has done. They\u2019ve also helped us understand what\u2019s happening, you know, with the oceans and the amount of water that is getting sucked out of the ice sheet and going into the ocean. So, these are all innovations that \u2013 you know, and knowledge that we have about our own planet because of NASA.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong>\u00a0 Sarah from DStv, your final question.<\/p>\n

Sarah Borchert:<\/strong> Yes. I think looking ahead to the future, Rory, what do you think the next 60 years of NASA might bring? What are the \u2013 do you think there are any big breakthroughs on the horizon? Where is the agency going, what\u2019s its direction?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy: Well, I think that there\u2019s a number of initiatives. So, I think the Mars mission is a serious one. I don\u2019t know when exactly that happens, but they are pushing to innovate so that we could get to Mars and, importantly, get back from Mars. And that, you know, is a serious endeavour that is complicated but doable. So, I think that\u2019s an exciting mission.<\/p>\n

I think we\u2019re really on the verge of finding life in the universe, and not only the universe but in our solar system. So, I\u2019m excited about, you know, that is a mind-blowing idea. And I think that we will \u2013 I think we\u2019ll find life in our solar system in our lifetime, if I had to guess, and that\u2019s exciting. I think that \u2013 I think the James Webb is really promising as the next level of telescopes going out into the world that will be able to look back through time \u2013 it\u2019s sort of considered a time machine\u00a0\u2013and it will be able to really see back to the beginnings of the universe and the Big Bang potentially. So, I think we\u2019ll get a huge amount of information and knowledge out of the James Webb telescope.<\/p>\n

And then, you know, my hope is that we will have \u2013 which, you know, we don\u2019t have it right now\u00a0\u2013but we will have leadership that will really empower these scientists to help us further understand what\u2019s happening to this planet and potentially ways to address it, you know, beyond limiting the amount of carbon. But I think we need to continue to innovate in terms of green energy. Right now, we have enough green innovation to light up and provide the electricity needed in \u2013 on the planet seven times over; but that we need, you know, in order to have that take over our electric grids and how they\u2019re sourced right now, we really need the involvement of the scientific community. I think, you know, looking at innovations and questions of how to reduce the carbon in the atmosphere, that we should really unleash our scientists to take on that, and to continue their efforts to really monitor the carbon released and the health of this planet, and the seas, and every aspect of the vegetation and all around. So, I think that is, you know, to me the most important thing that we could do, given the urgency of climate change.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Marwa from Gulf News, your last question.<\/p>\n

Marwa Hamad:<\/strong> Yeah. My last question would be, you know, going back to Above And Beyond, who do you think this movie is for?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> I think it\u2019s for, you know, all humans on Earth. I think that this movie helps us understand our planet, it helps us understand our place in the universe, it\u2019s hopefully entertaining, the engaging storytelling helps us also understand the \u2013 what\u2019s happening with our planet and the urgency of protecting this planet, and what we humans can do to protect it. So, I, you know, I think it\u2019s for a younger generation. You know, I\u2019ve shown it to my children who \u2013 my youngest child in his class when he was nine or ten years old, and they ate it up, and I think it\u2019s for them and the generations above to really understand what it means to explore, to go out into space, to challenge ourselves to do things that have never been done before, and it\u2019s exciting on that level. And then I think it\u2019s for older generations as well and people all \u2013 you know, this is not a film that is for people in the United States, even though NASA is an agency that was founded in the US \u2013 they\u2019ve partnered with countries all over the world. And our understanding and knowledge comes from those partnerships, and that understanding and knowledge impacts all of us equally.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Thank you. Fatima, your last question.<\/p>\n

Fatima Elidrissi:<\/strong> Yes. Well, unfortunately, Rory, [inaudible] John Kennedy or your father Bob Kennedy. So, I wanted to know if this documentary helped you get to know them better and what did you find out about them both, I mean professionally I assume, but also personally?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, I would say that, you know, I\u2019ve certainly become very intimate with the speech that my uncle gave at Rice University which I think was one of really his all-time great speeches he\u2019s given \u2013 and has been given in history, frankly. And, you know, the [inaudible] to have that vision, you know, in 1962 to get us to the moon within the decade when we had no rocket ships that could get us outside of Earth\u2019s atmosphere. We really had no knowledge of what it would mean to build the spacecraft, how it would impact astronauts, how we would get them back. You know, so I certainly have a deeper appreciation because of what that leadership moment entailed for my uncle, John F Kennedy, in the making of this.<\/p>\n

But, I mean, frankly, my father was less involved in this particular endeavour. So, I did make a film called Ethel, about my mother, where that was more part of that journey.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Thank you. Last question from Turkey.<\/p>\n

Demet Sarova:<\/strong> Yeah. My last question is about the documentary. What is the main enlightenment for the viewer, if we need to sum up?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, I think that, you know, to me this film is really an opportunity to inspire people to understand what it means to explore, to go into outer space, to push human limits. And I think that is a great message that NASA has given to all of us over these many years. I think it also is an example of what happens when you have great leadership and when we work together not only within the United States but outside of the US and partner with people all over the world to tap into the best in all of us.<\/p>\n

You know, in the \u2013 in his initial speech at Rice University, John F Kennedy said we choose to go to the moon in this decade not because it is easy but because it is hard, and because that goal will serve to organise and measure the best of our energies and skills. And I think that speaks to this idea of tapping into the best in all of us to bring forth something greater than any individual can do alone. And I think that\u2019s a poignant message for today. And then lastly, the, you know, the reminder of what these scientists are telling us in very scientific terms based on data of what is happening to our own planet. And I think that what one of the things NASA has learned over the years is in the exploration of our solar system and our galaxy and the universe, the further we\u2019ve got now, the deeper we\u2019ve gone into space the greater appreciation there has been for this planet and the preciousness of this planet and how unique it is; and, frankly, how unfriendly space is to humans.<\/p>\n

So, you know, we only have this planet. And we have searched for life, and we have searched for other planets like this, and to date we haven\u2019t found any. And I think the lesson there is, you know, in part, to do what we can to make sure we protect this planet.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Vanda, last question from you, please.<\/p>\n

Vanda Marques:<\/strong> Yes, thank you. Your projects are very different, you have NASA, you talked about Ethel. But, in a way, they also connect in some political way [inaudible] world, human rights. How do you choose your projects, and also why did you become a director?<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Well, I can\u2019t say there\u2019s a total logic to my choices in filmmaking, films and subject matter other than they all are of great interest to me. You know, it\u2019s hard to make a film; it\u2019s hard to make a documentary.<\/p>\n

Vanda Marques:<\/strong> Okay, thank you.<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> It takes a good amount of time, at least a year \u2013 this one took two years. And I have young children and, you know, so I have to make those choices to leave my children to go do this kind of work. I mean, I do it for a range of reasons, but I really need to feel passionate about it and excited about it. So, they all have done that for me.<\/p>\n

And I chose to become a filmmaker because I love storytelling, I think that it can really have an impact. And I think through these individual stories you can reach an audience on an emotional level, and help them understand issues and ideas through a true \u2013 you know, the human perspective that can be lasting and expand their knowledge, and also maybe their hearts a little to understanding, you know, and deepening their sense of compassion for others which I think we can all \u2013 you know, certainly it\u2019s been my experience in making these films, and hopefully it translates in the screening of them.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:\u00a0<\/strong>And then finally, last question from Ludmilla from Russia, if you have any more questions.<\/p>\n

Ludmilla Arinchina:<\/strong> You know, Rory, you answered all my questions in some way. So, thank you a lot.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:\u00a0<\/strong>Okay, perfect.<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> And, I\u2019d like to acknowledge with the Russians the amazing Soyuz. And it\u2019s \u2013 I know it\u2019s been a \u2013 I think, politically speaking, our countries haven\u2019t \u2013 had struggled over the last many years but in space we do quite well.<\/p>\n

Naomi Powell-Brown:<\/strong> Thank you. If any \u2013 for anyone else that\u2019s still on the line, thank you so much for your time and patience today.<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Thank you all, nice talking to you.<\/p>\n

Ludmilla Arinchina:<\/strong> Thank you, Rory.<\/p>\n

Rory Kennedy:<\/strong> Bye.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Naomi Powell-Brown:\u00a0 Okay. DStv Magazine, can you ask your first question please? Speaker:\u00a0 Yes. The first question is, so how did people imagine cosmos before the era of NASA? It was 60 years of people in space, we can say, almost. And before this era, we didn\u2019t know how to eat this cosmos, how to… Continue reading Q&A With Rory Kennedy: Above And Beyond NASA’s Journey To Tomorrow<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7757","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-television","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7757"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7757\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.samdb.co.za\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}